Reasoning from Suppositions
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
منابع مشابه
Reasoning about make - believe and hypothetical 3 suppositions : Towards a theory of 4 belief - contravening reasoning
9 The present study explores how suppositions which conflict with accepted beliefs are represented and 10 reasoned about. Two studies test the predictions regarding the nature and developmental changes in children’s 11 ability to represent and reason about hypothetical or make-believe suppositions which violate their everyday 12 knowledge and beliefs. In Study 1, 46 4thand 5th-graders were intr...
متن کاملModeling Suppositions in Users' Arguments
During conversation, people often make assumptions or suppositions that are not explicitly stated. Failure to identify these suppositions may lead to mis-communication. In this paper, we describe a procedure that postulates such suppositions in the context of the discourse interpretation mechanism of BIAS – a Bayesian Interactive Argumentation System. When a belief mentioned in a user’s discour...
متن کاملReasoning strategies for suppositional deductions.
Deductive reasoning shares with other forms of thinking a reliance on strategies, as shown by the results of three experiments on the nature and development of control strategies to solve suppositional deductions. These puzzles are based on assertors who may or may not be telling the truth, and their assertions about their status as truthtellers and liars. The first experiment shows that reason...
متن کاملThere aren't plenty more fish in the sea: a causal network approach.
The current research investigated how lay representations of the causes of an environmental problem may underlie individuals' reasoning about the issue. Naïve participants completed an experiment that involved two main tasks. The causal diagram task required participants to depict the causal relations between a set of factors related to overfishing and to estimate the strength of these relation...
متن کاملComputing Argumentation for Decision Making in Legal Disputes
In this paper, we present a decision support system for lawyer. This system is built upon an argumentation framework for decision making. A logic language is used as a concrete data structure for holding the statements like knowledge, goals, and decisions. Different priorities are attached to these items corresponding to the uncertainty of the knowledge about the circumstances, the lawyer’s pre...
متن کامل